| CRITIQUING A TALK | |||||||||
| (Ed. Note: The following critique form has been developed for the use in critiquing all talks.Because | |||||||||
| of the ecumenical nature of the Walk, it is necessary that all clergy talks also be critiqued.) | |||||||||
| Judge gently and charitably…with a smile on your lips…be open to God's message | |||||||||
| SPEAKER | TALK | ||||||||
| The following points or questions should be answered by the critiquer: | |||||||||
| 1) | Did speaker follow the outline, touching each point, in the sequence the | ||||||||
| outline calls for? | yes / no | ||||||||
| 2) | Were all the main points emphasized? | yes / no | |||||||
| Were all the main points sufficiently stressed? | yes / no | ||||||||
| 3) | Beginning time: | Ending time: | |||||||
| Elapsed time: | Allotted time: | ||||||||
| 4) | How many personal witnesses were there? | ||||||||
| Identify them: | |||||||||
| a) | |||||||||
| b) | |||||||||
| c) | |||||||||
| d) | |||||||||
| 5) | Were the above witnesses helpful in understanding the speaker's life? | yes / no | |||||||
| 6) | Were they an aid to understanding his walk with Christ? | yes / no | |||||||
| 7) | Were any of the witnesses confusing, or did any detract from the talk? | yes / no | |||||||
| 8) | Were the write me downs clear and understandable? | yes / no | |||||||
| 9) | As a listener, did you come to know the speaker as an intimate friend? | yes / no | |||||||
| 10) | Tone: | Monotone | Exciting | Spirited | Dry | Boring | |||
| Circle one | Varied | Long | Choppy | Preachy | Talky | ||||
| Conversational | Brief | Academic | Lively | ||||||
| 11) | Scripture: | Too much | Too little | Too long on references | |||||
| Circle one | On target | Missed target | No references | ||||||
| 12) | Other: | ||||||||
| 13) | Recommendations: | ||||||||
| Does this talk need to be critiqued again?_____Can you do it?____When?____ | |||||||||
| Your Name | Date | ||||||||